Posts Tagged ‘insurance’

House Advances Bill to Repeal Tax Reporting Provision in Healthcare Reform

February 23rd, 2011 by Iris | Comments Off | Filed in health care reform

Last Friday, the House Ways and Means Committee advanced a bill to repeal the tax reporting provision that was included in last year’s healthcare reform legislation. The Senate had already voted to repeal the 1099 provision requiring businesses to report on purchases of goods and services totaling more than $600.

President Obama said he supports the repeal.

Under current law, 1099′s must be filed for expenses paid to unincorporated entity, but the new requirement would require that expenses like phone and Internet services be filed starting next year.

According to Jimi Grande, senior vice president of federal and political affairs at NAMIC (the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies), “This requirement provides no benefit to the businesses that have to file the paperwork or the taxpayers. Instead, it will be a massive drain on time and resources that would be better spent elsewhere.”

The bill was introduced by Rep. Dan Lungren (R – CA), and has 272 co-sponsors. It has since been sent to the House floor for debate and a vote.

Tags: , , , , , ,

CA Insurance Commissioner Calls on Insurers to Invest in Community Development

February 22nd, 2011 by Iris | Comments Off | Filed in business insurance, health insurance

Dave Jones, the California Insurance Commissioner, has offered the insurance industry $4.67 million worth of tax credits to invest in under-served communities.

In a letter he sent to the CEOs of insurance companies doing business in California, Jones encouraged insurers to place part of their $4 trillion in investments into COIN – the California Organization Investment Network, administered by the California Department of Insurance (CDI).

Every year, the DOI (Department of Insurance) allocates $2 million in tax credits to support community development investments in the amount of $10 million. Because this program has not been fully exploited in recent years, CDI’s COIN program currently has $4.67 million available tax credits to support $23.7 million in community development investments. There is a deadline of July 1, 2011 to place investments into the program; after that other investors also have access to the pool of tax credits.

Under the COIN program, insurers put at least $50,000 on deposit with a designated Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI) for five years at zero percent interest. In exchange, the investor receives a state tax credit of 20% with an annual percentage rate of return of roughly 4.5 percent.

In turn, the CDFI’s then provide loans to non-profit organizations and small businesses that serve economically disadvantaged communities. The CDFIs serve as a bridge across the ever-expanding gap between loans and services available to those who are “economically mainstream” and those people and communities who are considered low-income. These loans help provide development services and technical assistance in these communities, as well as the money from the loans themselves.

These CDFIs include community development loan funds, credit unions, banks, microenterprise funds, corporation-based lenders and venture funds.

In a statement, Commissioner Jones said, “This is a critical program that benefits some of California’s most underserved communities, and so I want to encourage insurance companies to give back by investing in these communities. The state tax credit to encourage these investments has been underutilized in recent years, and it is long overdue that we get this program back on track. I call on all California insurers to examine their investment portfolios and invest in this program before June 30.”

Since 1997, 81 CDFIs have been certified by COIN as eligible for the tax credit program. Some of their investments in the past fourteen years include:

• A mortgage loan for a nonprofit residential alcohol treatment facility;

• Micro-loans of $500 to $5,000 to self-employed business owners;

• Loans for six childcare centers to serve 500 low-income children;

• Pre-development loans to Habitat for Humanity to construct affordable homes;

• A loan to a church to build a child care center for lower income residents;

• A loan for 953 water hook-ups in two small, rural communities; and

• A short-term loan to close escrow on housing for low-income foster youth.

Tags: , ,

Landscaper Insurance???

January 25th, 2011 by Iris | Comments Off | Filed in business insurance, insurance news

Okay, we know there is insurance out there for almost everything. I mean, just last Christmas we learned that you can get insurance in case you fall out of a sleigh. But a lawmaker in Rhode Island has recently filed a bill that would require landscapers to register with the state and carry at least $100,000 in public liability and property damage insurance.

The bill was sponsored the earlier this week by Rhode Island state Senator John J. Tassoni, Jr. (D-Smithfield) who says that the point of it is to “level the playing field” between reputable, upstanding landscaping companies and “fly-by-night” companies that don’t pay taxes. He also claims that since the latter sort of landscaper has no overhead they have a big advantage.

Tassoni also said his state is losing a lot of revenue from income and sales taxes.

A spokeswoman for a taxpayer and business advocacy group known as the Rhode Island Statewide Coalition said that she was concerned that smaller landscaping businesses could be hurt by the bill’s requirements.

What I want to know is, what are they defining as a “landscaping business?” Will the teenager who mows someone’s lawn for $20 have to find the cash to buy $100,000 in insurance if this bill passes?

Tags: , , , ,

California Insurance Commissioner Files Lawsuit to Prevent Iranian Investments

November 10th, 2010 by Iris | Comments Off | Filed in insurance news, insurance specialists, world events

The Insurance Journal reported early this morning that Steve Poizner, California Insurance Commissioner, has stated that he is filing a lawsuit challenging last month’s decision from the California Office of Administrative Law (OAL) that his efforts to prevent insurance companies from investing in Iran constituted an “underground regulation.”

Poizner’s lawsut contests the OA’s analysis of this issue and also seeks to clarify his authority to address the issue at all. Attorney General Jerry Brown is representing the commissioner in the suit.

In a statement to the press, Poizner said, “I intend to ensure that any insurance company licensed in California is not doing business, in any way, with the Iranian regime. Insurance premium dollars that Californians pay should not end up supporting a regime that has shown time and time again its disregard for the concerns of the global community. The consensus is clear, as seen in the sanctions that the United Nations, the European Union, the U.S. government, and the California Legislature have imposed over the past two years — responsible businesses should not be doing business with Iran. Since companies doing business with Iran face financial risk, I have the authority to protect insurer portfolios from investments in those companies.”

The commissioner launched an initiative to identify Iran-related investments in insurers’ portfolios In June 2009, asking that the 1,300 insurance companies licensed in California identify all investments in companies doing business with the Iranian defense, energy and nuclear sectors. Fifty companies with ongoing business activities in Iran were identified by the Department of Insurance, and in the spring of this year, the commissioner requested a moratorium, beseeching insurance companies not to make any new investments in companies on the CDI list. More than 1,000 of them agreed to this.

Despite this, the Association of California Insurance Companies, the Association of California Life and Health Insurance Companies, the Personal Insurance Federation of California and the American Insurance Association grouped together to express their concerns with the law, and to file a petition with the OAL, because they believed the state insurance commissioner’s anti-Iranian investment rules constituted an “underground” regulation.

Tags: , , , ,

Recycling and Insurance?

April 23rd, 2010 by Iris | Comments Off | Filed in insurance news, insurance specialists

Yesterday was the 40th anniversary of the Environmental Protection Agency and it’s Earth Day awareness program. We’re all familiar with the EPA’s “reduce, reuse, and recycle” slogan, but that phrase is much more than a mere tagline. The EPA wants it to be a way of life for people and businesses throughout the country.

In honor of the occasion, the Insurance Journal podcast hosted Nicole Croteau, vice president of Willis Programs, to speak about how the recyling industry, and it’s insurance program, have grown and developed over the years.

Enjoy.

Tags: , ,

Hospital Cost Shifting Not a New Trend

April 21st, 2010 by Iris | Comments Off | Filed in auto insurance, health insurance, insurance news, medicare

The Insurance Journal is reporting on an alarming change within the hospital industry, one that has been going on since long before the passage of the healthcare reform bill last month: Because they get lower reimbursements from public health insurance services like Medicaid and Medicare, many hospitals are trying to find new ways of making money, and some are doing that by shifting costs away from conventional insurance and toward car insurance companies. How? By raising auto accident injury claim costs, and forcing those insurers to take more careful looks at their hospital bills prior to payment.

In a recent study released by the Insurance Research Council (IRC), it was estimated that in 38 tort and add-on states, cost shifting for bodily injury (BI) claims resulted in $1.2 billion in excess hospital charges in the 2007. That’s a fairly large number, but the study also says that the full impact of hospital cost shifting, especially when other states and other kinds of coverage are factored in, is likely to be much greater.

According to Elizabeth Sprinkel, senior vice president of the IRC, “The conventional wisdom is that hospitals aggressively seek to shift costs from public insurance programs to private payers such as auto insurance companies. With this study, we now have information on the magnitude of cost shifting and a better understanding of the need for supportive state laws and effective tools that will enable auto insurers to pay hospitals appropriately and help control auto injury claim costs.”

Sprinkel also said that hospital cost shifting to auto injury claims .”…illustrates the complex relationship between property/casualty insurance and the broader healthcare and insurance system.” She went on to add, “Healthcare legislation enacted by Congress last month underscores the complexity of this relationship. It will take months, if not years, to understand the full impact of the reforms on hospital cost shifting and the auto insurance system.”

In order to analyze the relationship between health system features and automobile injury hospital costs, the IRC had to develop a statistical model of average hospital charges for injury claims in different states. The model then confirmed key predictors of the average hospital charges, which were the percentages of a given state’s population without health insurance, and with Medicaid coverage.

Excess hospital charges due to cost shifting were estimated by comparing average BI liability claims charges in Maryland with average charges in 38 other tort and add-on states. Maryland was used because it received a government waiver in the 1970′s which allows it to regulate hospital reimbursement rates for all “purchasers of hospital services,”and which means there are almost no hospital cost shifting in that state. Maryland, therefore, makes an excellent “control” state, and in all cases, IRC found that average hospital charges for auto injury were substantially lower there than in most other states. Likewise, the costs of expensive diagnostic procedures performed in Maryland hospitals were lower than in other states, but, when performed outside a hospital, the costs were much more similar to those in other states.

The IRC study, Hospital Cost Shifting and Auto Injury Insurance Claims, is based on data from more than 42,000 auto injury claims closed with payment under the five principal private passenger coverages. Twenty-two insurers, representing 58 percent of the private passenger auto insurance market in the Unites Sates in 2006, participated in the study.

Tags: , , ,