Archive for October, 2010

Denying Coverage to Children is Illegal, Washington Commissioner Says

October 20th, 2010 by Iris | Comments Off | Filed in health care reform, health insurance

Mike Kreidler, Insurance Commissioner for the state of Washington has issued an order to Regence BlueShield telling them to stop illegally refusing to cover children. Last week, the company announced it would no longer sell policies to children, but according to Kreidler, “Regence is in clear violation of state law that prohibits insurers from denying insurance to people on the basis of age.”

Under the Affordable Care Act, all health plans are legally required to cover children with pre-existing conditions. In order to accommodate insurance industry concerns that such children would only be enrolled when they became sick, however, the federal government enabled individual states to create special open enrollments.

Kreidler issued an emergency order creating such an enrollment period which will run from November 1st through December 15th, during which time those seeking individual health plans for their entire family or only for their kids can enroll them without having to participate in an exam.

In response to this, Regence BlueShield, the largest health insurer in the individual market notified the commissioner’s office that it would stop selling individual health insurance policies to children effective October 1, 2010.

Commissioner Kriedler said, “Regence’s decision had a serious impact on Washington families and could’ve had a devastating impact on the insurance market. We worked hard with the large health insurers to accommodate their concerns and most, including Premera and Group Health did the right thing. Frankly, Regence deserves the backlash from its decision. It overreacted and now finds itself in violation of the law.”

Regence currently has approximately 2,500 child-only policies in force.

Kreidler added, “Hundreds of consumers have contacted my office, upset over Regence refusing to cover kids and for blaming its recent rate increases on health reform. I can understand why they’re confused and mad. I’m sick and tired of the insurance industry pulling these stunts and misleading the public about health reform. I expect better of companies wanting to do business in Washington.”

Source:the Insurance Journal

Tags: , , ,

California’s Prop 19 An Insurance Issue? Maybe So

October 19th, 2010 by Iris | Comments Off | Filed in health insurance, workers compensation insurance

BankRate ran an article earlier this week that brought up some really interesting points. You may not know this, but in just a couple of weeks, Californian’s may legalize marijuana possession and use, and if that happens, law enforcement won’t be the only thing affected. The insurance industry, specifically in regards to worker’s comp insurance, and even employee health insurance, will also be affected.

How do businesses handle an employee who is legally using marijuana? Should that be handled any differently from an employee who uses over-the-counter antihistamines? Here are some of the questions BankRate believes employers need to ask:

* Are medical marijuana users exempt from my anti-drug policies?
* Can I fire an employee for using medical marijuana?
* Can I refuse to hire a job candidate based on their medical marijuana use?
* Can a medical marijuana user sue me under the Americans with Disabilities Act?
* Do state laws supersede federal laws that classify pot as an illegal substance?
* Could I run afoul of federal contracts if I don’t enforce a no-drug policy?

And of course, users also have concerns they need to address:

* If I use medical marijuana, will I get fired, or perhaps not hired in the future?
* How will medical marijuana use impact my employer’s mandatory drug testing?
* Should I even divulge my “med-hemp” use to my employer?

As the original article points out, the answers to these questions are somewhat murky, especially when you take into account the different local, state and federal laws regarding medical marijuana use, many of which are in direct conflict with each other. And, as usual, it’s the people who are caught in the middle.

Tags: ,

Farmers Now Insures Property on FarmVille. No, Really.

October 18th, 2010 by Iris | Comments Off | Filed in insurance news, insurance specialists

When we saw this in the Insurance Journal this morning, we thought it was a joke. It’s not. Effective today, Farmers Insurance Group is offering the 60 million monthly players of Farmville virtual crop insurance.

In the game, Farmers will be represented by a virtual version of the Farmers Insurance Airship, which, in the real world, is a 246-foot long Zeppelin. In exchange for placing it on their farms, players will receive “wither protection” for their virtual crops. This protection will last for the ten days of the promotion.

Farmers is offering this protection in cooperation with Zynga, the company which makes FarmVille, the game that is considered the most popular such diversion on Facebook.

According to Kevin Kelso, chief marketing officers of Farmers Insurance Group, Inc., “This is the first time an insurance company will be featured within internet Social Gaming. It’s an innovative and exciting way to showcase our online and interactive presence.”

The campaign will begin Oct. 18, 2010 and for the first 10 days the Farmers Airship will be available for free. In addition, during a sweepstakes which began on October 1st and runs until November 15th on Farmers’ Facebook page, fans of the insurer can enter to win a ride for themselves and a guest on the actual Farmers Airship.

Tags: , , ,

Friday Filmstrips: Light Your Pilot

October 15th, 2010 by Iris | Comments Off | Filed in advice and how-tos, fire insurance, friday filmstrips

With cooler weather comes the desire for the soothing crackle of a warm fire. If you have a gas insert in your fireplace, you may have turned the gas off for the summer. This video from WoodHeat.com and YouTube explains how to re-light the pilot for your gas fireplace.

Remember to check your fire insurance policy first, then enjoy:

Tags: ,

Earthquake Rattles Oklahoma

October 14th, 2010 by Iris | Comments Off | Filed in earthquake insurance, homeowners insurance

You probably wouldn’t think to buy earthquake insurance if you lived in Oklahoma, but perhaps wherever you are, you should think again.

According to local NPR station KGOU a quake at 9:06 CDT on Wednesday morning was one of the strongest earthquakes ever recorded in Oklahoma, left two people with injuries (minor ones), and was felt in parts of five other states, including Texas.

The United States Geological Survey rated the temblor at a magnitude of 4.3 and said the epicenter was about six miles northeast of Norman, OK.

Oklahoma has only recorded three stronger earthquakes since becoming a state one hundred and three years ago. The sharpest ever was a 5.0 shaker that struck El Reno, a town just west of Oklahoma City, in 1952.

Tags: , ,

49% Of People with Pre-Existing Conditions Denied Health Insurance, Report Says

October 13th, 2010 by Iris | Comments Off | Filed in health care reform, health insurance, insurance news

One of the larger elements of the health insurance reform laws that were passed earlier this year was a ban on coverage denials for people with pre-existing health conditions. However, that part of the legislation is not yet in force and, perhaps in anticipation of times to come, the top for-profit health insurers in the country have increased their denials based on medical history by roughly 50% over the last few years.

According to Reuters, a report released on Tuesday by the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s top Democrats, the number of people who have been refused health insurance plans for pre-existing conditions by Aetna, Humana, United Health Group, and WellPoint has risen by 49 percent in the past three years. These denials have affected thousands of individuals trying to buy their own insurance. In 2009, for example, 257,100 people were denied coverage, up from 172,400 in 2007.

Overall, said committee members, insurance companies refused to sell plans to one in every seven applicants, or more than 651,000 people.

While the health care reforms passed last March would make such denials illegal, those protections don’t kick in until 2014. Until then, only children have guaranteed coverage – and, speaking of children – all four of those insurance consider pregnancy to be a pre-existing condition, which triggers automatic denials. As well, most of them won’t cover maternity care under policies issued to women who are not already pregnant, though some do offer additional pregnancy “rider” policies.

The result? According to the report, “…women who are pregnant, expectant fathers, and families attempting to adopt children are generally unable to obtain health insurance in the individual market.” As with other pre-existing conditions, changes to maternity coverage don’t come into force until 2014.

Currently, consumers can apply for coverage through a temporary national program that functions as a stop-gap.

With these results coming out just weeks before the mid-term congressional elections, Democrats are using them to tout the health laws passed last spring. Even so, consumer advocates say there is precious little relief available to those who are not insured through an employer or government program.

Steven Findlay, a senior health policy analyst with consumers Untion explained to the press, “We will continue to see an insurance market that does not allow people to get in. Some companies may try to clean up their act a little bit.”

The America’s Health Insurance Plans, an organization which represents American health insurers and largely fought against the health care reform law passed this year, has said that companies must determine a potential customer’s health beforehand to prevent individuals from seeking coverage only after they get sick. “Health plans recognize that individuals with pre-existing medical conditions have difficulty obtaining coverage,” AHIP spokesman Robert Zirkelbach said.

Tags: , ,

Most Doctors Don’t Use Email with Patients, Survey Says

October 12th, 2010 by Iris | Comments Off | Filed in health insurance, insurance facts

A new study released recently by the Center for Studying Health System Change shows that less than 7% of office-based physicians routinely use email to communicate with their patients, even though such communication does much to improve patient satisfaction. The study involved a survey of 4,258 doctors (not including pathologists, anesthesiologists, etc.), and was done in 2008.

Of those surveyed, only 34.5% said that their offices were equipped to use electronic communication for “clinical issues” with their patients, and of those that were so equipped, only 19.5% of them said that they regularly emailed their patients.

Why don’t doctors use email? Some of the reasons given included:

  • Lack of reimbursement
  • Concerns about increased workload
  • Maintaining data security and privacy
  • Avoiding increased liability

While the vast majority of doctors won’t use email, that doesn’t mean they don’t use other forms of information technology, the survey said. 76.6 of those physicians surveyed said they had electronic access to lab, radiology, or other diagnostic tests, with 61.8% of them using it on a regular basis. 56.8% had electronic access to patient notes, “problem lists” or medication lists, and another 42.2% had access to online prescription tools.

Tags: ,